Interview with Mike Ceresi
Mike Ciresi has achieved tremendous victories in the courtroom for women, Minnesota, Minnesota companies, the people of India and many more. Now he wants to add one more achievement to this impressive list, beat Norm Coleman in November of 2008 in the MN-SEN race. He challenged Mark Dayton for the DFL endorsement back in 2000, but couldn't quite pull it off. He thinks that 2008 is his year. I met with Mike and Leslie Sandberg, his Communications Director, at Louisiana Cafe in Saint Paul last Friday to talk about his campaign over breakfast.
Achievements
The Dalkon Shield was a intrauterine contraceptive device.
- By the spring of 1974, A. H. Robins had received more than 400 complaints. Women often fainted from the pain of insertion. Many experienced cramping, bleeding, and infections that resulted in hysterectomies or sterility. Women who conceived despite wearing the device suffered a 60 percent miscarriage rate, often coupled with life-threatening blood infections. The remaining pregnancies resulted in premature births and severe birth defects.
(Answers.com)
Mike's law firm, Robins, Miller, Kaplan and Ciresi LLP was the only midwestern firm approached about taking the Dalkon Shield case, the rest were east or west coast firms. He was the lead attorney and won a $2.5 billion trust for the victims.
In 1984, a Union Carbide subsidiary released 27 tons of poisonous gases into the middle of Bhopal India, a city of more than a million people. An estimated 22,000 people died in the catastrophe and countless thousands were injured. Union Carbide denied any culpability and attempted to hide behind its subsidiary. Mike's firm was selected to represent the government of India against Union Carbide. He won a $350 million settlement in US courts for the victims which established a fund which is now probably worth around $600 million or more. Furthermore, Union Carbide agreed to pay $470 million in damages.
In 1991, Honeywell sued Minolta over camera autofocus technology. This was a landmark case in intellectual property rights.
- Honeywell attorney Michael Ciresi called the autofocus technology "the holy grail of the camera industry" and said Minolta was unable to master it until after it signed a contract with Honeywell. The contract involved the two companies sharing data about a Honeywell autofocus module in exchange for an agreement that the part would be included in cameras Minolta manufactured. Ciresi told the court that the team working on the Minolta autofocus system and the one reviewing Honeywell's technology shared the same work space and the same people worked on both teams.
(Washington Post)
Minolta eventually settled for $127.5 million. Other manufacturers also settled for an estimated $500 million.
In 1994, Minnesota became the second state to sue Big Tobacco and he was the lead attorney after millions and millions of pages of secret documents were released to the public. These documents showed how Big Tobacco hid the addictive nature of cigarettes and how they marketed them to children.
- "The evidence will show this is a renegade industry which has placed profit ahead of the health of its customers," attorney Michael Ciresi said in his opening statement.
"Marlboro has risen to its No. 1 position on the backs of America's youth," he said. Cigarette companies "treated America's youth as a commodity, as a source of replacement smokers."
The industry documents will prove that the industry conspired to conceal what it knew about the hazards of smoking as early as the 1950s, Ciresi said.
(USAToday)
Big Tobacco settled in 1998 for $6 billion.
Why Mike Ciresi?
"It's a case of talk versus walk," he explained. "What have they [his opponents for the DFL endorsement] done? I've fought for women injured by the Dalkon Shield, I've fought Big Tobacco and Union Carbide. What have they achieved."
If you want someone who is a proven fighter for the people of Minnesota, Mike Ciresi might be your man. He's articulate, direct and intelligent. Actually, we're blessed with an abundance of smarts on the DFL side and Ciresi has proven his guile and craft. He's been in the middle of a number of precedent setting cases. He now wants to translate his legal experience into politics. He likely can. His broad range of cases indicate that he can work in any legal area. But where does he stand on the issues that are important to progressives?
Iraq War
"The Iraq War has destabilized the Middle East," began Mike when I asked him about his position on Iraq. "The Bush Administration's war has cost us international prestige. It was wrong. We need to get out as soon as possible. We need to have an international peace conference to begin dealing with the mess the Bush Administration has created. We need to beef up our special ops and begin dealing with the terrorists in Afghanistan who attacked us on 9/11."
"Guantanamo Bay needs to be closed," he continued. "We can no longer be taken seriously when we talk about democracy, freedom and rule of law. Gitmo is one of the worst examples of what the Bush Administration has done to our prestige. The intelligence community and the military both say that we don't get good information out of there. It's accepted that torturing prisoners harms our reputation, endangers our troops even further and damages our standing in the international community. Gitmo needs to close and we need to stop torturing enemy combatants."
He then brought up the concept of what we could do if we had spent the $500 billion we've already spent on the Iraq War on education. "We could pay for every child's K12 education and have paid for a 4 year college education for every single student in the US. That would definitely make a difference in people's lives."
Habeas Corpus
Mike believes we need to restore habeas corpus and supports the Habeas Corpus Restoration Act that is currently making its way through Congress.
Terrorism
Mike believes that there are latent terrorist cells in the US. We need to beef up our FBI counter-terrorism efforts.
Healthcare
Mike is not in favor of single payer universal healthcare. "Currently, we don't have a healthcare system," he explained. "We need to focus on preventative care and guarantee universal health insurance coverage. It needs to be portable and so does your medical information. Pre-existing conditions must be covered no matter what. Insurance companies always pick the healthiest and youngest first then the older and healthy. They grant coverage to people with pre-existing conditions last if at all. This is wrong."
"At the law firm," he continued. "We pay roughly $11,000 per year for each employees insurance and $8,500 per dependent. Coverage for an employee runs $200 per month for just the employee. This does not include medication and dental benefits; they're additional expenses. The costs are increasing at double digits every year and we need to get it under control. We need to let the states innovate. They will find solutions that best fit them."
He wants Medicare to negotiate for cheaper drug prices for senior citizens.
Impeachment
"No," stated Mike when I asked about impeachment. "We need to address the issues not chase guys who will be out of office in 18 months anyway. It would be a distraction and I'm not for it."
Renewable Energy
I ran out of time, I had to get to work. Mike is out of town campaigning, but Leslie Sandberg assured me she'd get me a statement on Renewable Energy.
Odds n Ends
On topic that didn't really fit into anywhere above is the Bush Administration's insidious efforts to install right wing political hacks at every level of government, but shows the depth to which Mike understands the horrible state our country is in. "Until this administration, America has had a consistent focus on multilateral diplomacy," Mike claimed. "It has been fostered by the civilian employees throughout all levels of government. In effect these nonpartisan employees provide a steady hand at the wheel of the state. Since 2000 the Bush Administration has been yanking out these roots and installing loyal Bushies who have undermined these roots and helped destroy our standing in the international community."
- The Big E's blog
- Login or register to post comments







Stumble It!

Jack Nelson-Palmeyer has walked the talk, Mike
Mike Ciresi is only partly apt in pointing out his opponents for the Democratic Party endorsement for the US Senate are unsatisfactory in walking the talk. Yes, where was Al Franken before the Iraq War? Answer: cheering it on. Where was Bob Olson? Answer: unknown. Now, where was Mike Ciresi, the most famous and wealthy trial lawyer in Minnesota history? Answer: not in the public eye. No where close to leadership we need there.
Where was yet to be announced candidate Jack Nelson-Palmeyer? Answer: Everywhere and anywhere leading efforts to prevent it. (When he wasn't leading efforts to close The School of The Americas)
Now, after the war has been raging, where have the announced candidates been? Answer: Late, very late, to anything resembling a call for withdrawal. None have been talking about the root causes of the War: oil, US militarism and imperialism, so none have solutions that seriously and comprehensively address the problem.
But Jack Nelson-Palmeyer has been talking about root causes of the War. The Professor of Justice and Peace Studies knows that the root causes have to be addressed, and so any support for further US military occupation of Iraq in any shape shifting form of any sort is unacceptable, as does any privatization of Iraq oil. But the other, already announced candidates don't even talk about these essential aspects of establishing peace and justice in the region.
Denial of Health Care
One boring long rant!
Ciresi response
I received an email from Kerry Greeley, Campaign Manager for Mike Ciresi:
video on this is on our site now. You might want to let Grace know that we have a healthcare video and white paper up that show's Mike's position is quite different than she represents it in her post.
Kerry
Go to the Media section on the their website and look for the Mike on Healthcare vid (sorry, I can't link directly to it. Here's some text from the Issues page:
We will make this cost-effective because we will:
employers to provide quality insurance at an affordable price.
Point by Point
1) First of all, cheers for "Require drug companies to negotiate with Medicare". Note even though most American want this, it is not happening in Congress.
2) Cheers for the sentiment of "Keep people affordably insured for their lifetime – from job to job, and through retirement, and forever eliminate the term “pre-existing condition”. Except how are you going to do that? How do you do affordable? Without analysis, this statement is a fluff statement.
2) "Provide universal coverage" - This has been implemented by requiring everyone to have health insurance. That means I would have to pay whatever high insurance price is asked by the insurance company, with coverage that is basically useless because of deductables, copays, and a maximum that the insurance company will pay for any procedure. It is monopoly pricing! Add to that exclusions for "experimental", etc. Now if you meant universal as in single payer or government provided insurance, then I would cheer.
3) "Keep people healthy through preventative health care and early detection and cure of diseases – before they become chronic problems"
Insurance does not even cover real medical problems now! See the stories on SICKO on this blog. This is just plain hype. It is a Republican like argument of blame, where if you are sick, then it is your fault that everything is expensive. The fault of rising health care costs lies outside of the individuals. Prevention is a distraction from the real greed issues of health providers.
4) "Reduce error and waste by making a single, electronic record of a patient’s history accessible to those who need it, when they need it, but with the highest level of security to protect our privacy" The health care providers collect and keep this information already. If this statement had a clause where health providers could keep NO previous medical history on a client, nor consider any discriminating information in taking a client, then we would be OK. See when I insure my house, the insurance company cannot predict if a tornado will hit it and therefore cannot discriminate against me. An health insurance insurance company can predict health and cherry pick who they insure. Besides, this record issue is another distraction. If you look at my previous SICKO story and people's comments, the denial or delay of coverage had nothing to do with records. Actually I wish all my medical records were continuously destroyed, then I would have faith that I have privacy.
5) "Provide everyone with cost-effective medical, prescription and mental health insurance coverage at an affordable price, and which allows people to choose their provider and purchase more options." See here is the problem: "cost effective". At minimum, we are talking a 30 percent bureaucracy cost plus a huge profit burden on health care. Just look at other countries, we get half the health care at twice the price. Without looking at the true causes of our health care problem, this is a hoping-for-a-lottery-win solution.
6)"Use the collective buying power of all Americans and their
employers to provide quality insurance at an affordable price."
Here it is - the support of the broken private health care system. Why bargain collectively, lets self insure! Let people and doctors make health care decisions again instead of greedy profit driven accountants!
7)"Strengthen existing programs such as Medicare which covers seniors, SCHIP which covers children, and the VA that covers veterans." Another hoping-for-a-lottery-win solution statement that does not indicate any understanding of the process.
Here should be the health care points:
1) All health care information (minus personal identification) becomes public information, so we can better evaluate doctors, hospital, procedures, trends, pricing, how insurance pays and costs. With the sunshine of actual information, we can really deal with what is going on.
2) All health care prices for the same procedure from a health care provider must be the same cost no matter who the patient is, no matter who insurer is and no matter who is paying. These prices must be readily available ahead of time. No hidden add on charges either.
3) The government will insure all US citizens. Medical doctors or hospitals that try to work for profit instead for the good of patients or else those medical doctors or hospitals will lose the right to practice for an appropriate period of time, as well as pay damages and fines. Just like the government provides roads the government should provide health care. Health care is not a wait and shop fair market type of thing. Health is necessity and a right!
4) The government will finance and control all further drug development, so there will no longer be monopolistic drug pricing. Researchers have often said that research would be faster and more effective if it was collaborative. Then we would be developing serious cures instead of hair tonics.
In addition to lower health care costs for truly universal health care coverage by government self insurance, we would also have two additional benefits. Health care would no longer be a burden of employment, which would really stimulate more job development. With universal health care, we could have better inoculations and disease control, so we would have a chance of stopping an pandemic outbreak early.
Now I spoke the plain truth right out loud. If a politician speaks the truth then, the health care companies would spend a ton of money in advertising. If all of us starting speaking the truth, it would be much harder to deceive. If no one speaks the truth, then health care will continue to get worse until a major health crisis breaks the system entirely.
Unfit
A person who cannot see the need for impeachment in the present emergency is not fit to sit in the US Senate. From the mouth of James Madison, three examples of public acts that cry for impeachment:
1. Commuting Libby. "If the President be connected, in any suspicious manner with any person, and there be grounds to believe that he will shelter him, the House of Representatives can impeach him; they can remove him if found guilty."
2. Retaining Gonzales. "If an unworthy man be continued in office by an unworthy President, the House can at any time impeach the President."
3. Firing the US Attorneys. "I contend that the wanton removal of meritorious officers would subject him to impeachment and removal."
The truth is that my country is in danger. Understand that, or lose my vote.
Ciresi
Mike Ciresi has done his part to help the community but not because of his philanthropic nature but to wash his sins in order for people to vote him again. One thing he did that touched me more was the California drug northern rehab action. He visited this center and helped raise funds for it. Now it's one of the biggest centers around although it was a very small unknown one until Ciresi dealt with their problems. I'm not a politics lover and I'd never help one party or another win the elections but I'd shake Ciresi's hand as a thank you and wish him well and good luck in his work. This because I'm an ex-addict myself and I had the privilege to be treated in a decent clinic.
Mike Ciresi, thank you for
Mike Ciresi, thank you for not running.
When I hear about the Iraq
When I hear about the Iraq war, everything I hear is just sorry words for these people. But why not giving them a hand? Help, they are people too. He should go first to an alcohol rehab and after he is all clean, to figure out a way to help people.
Re:Interview with Mike Ceresi
While most Minnesotans have stuck comedian Al Franken in their minds as the next Minnesota DFL Senate candidate, St. Thomas peace studies professor Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer is still vying for the party’s upcoming June nomination. Despite barely being mentioned in the local media, Nelson-Pallmeyer surpassed Mike Ceresi in the race and is slowly but surely winning over the most liberal sectors of the DFL. After looking into his campaign, I found out that Nelson-Pallmeyer is a more progressive, less elite alternative to Franken. Although Franken often mentions the late Sen. Paul Wellstone as his role model, Nelson-Pallmeyer’s grassroots campaign, stances on the issues, and intellectual demeanor (he’s an educator) resemble Wellstone much more than a comedian running for office does.
---------------------
williamgeorge
california drug rehab