Handshake Budget Agreement
SPNN just ran the press conference on the handshake deal between the governor, the senate and the house on the budget. Highlights include:
- budget balanced for two years, although not structurally balanced over the long run. After years of NOT investing in the state, and the influence of bad federal financial management, the downward spiral of our Minnesota economy and therefore the downward spiral of tax revenues is clear.
-
a 3.9% property tax cap for three years, that has many exceptions, that is somewhat offset by 60 million dollars of LGA and more bureaucratic form of personal tax relief (instead of simple progressive income taxes). This is just more of making the state budget problem into the local government budget problem! This gives the Republicans a free talking point to voters who have the Republican belief blinders.
-
some Mall of America money giveaways (all business has to do is waive the "jobs" argument in front of labor)
- health care access bill which does not really impress me since it is not single payer health insurance, so no significant change happened. Somehow without taking out profit and taking out the bad health care insurance bureaucracy, the group thinks they achieved 15% cost containment. 12,000 more citizens will have access, presumably under state sponsored plans. Some nursing home care workers will get a raise.
-
somehow $51 dollar permanent per pupil increase was achieved in education
-
the bonding bill will allow the Governor's treasured Vermillion state park, plus repairs to the Minneapolis veterans home, more bridge repair and more CAPRA maintenance funds.
-
the St Paul central corridor project, which puts Minnesota in next step of regional light rail. This is the best long term solution to high gas prices.
-
the military vets get a $750 personal tax credit and a few other tax credits
-
Duluth gets an arena (after all sports is more important than anything else, right)
This is based on quick notes, so don't hold me to great accuracy here. In fact, the press conference was quite ad hoc in its presentation.
I think the Democratic leadership did as well as they could with a Republican governor who wants to be a vice presidential candidate.
If you want to change this, let's go help elect Democrats in other districts! Lets ensure that we have a really good candidate for governor next time. Volunteer often!
I totally agree with Senator Larry Pogemiller that open meetings would have helped. We are still fighting defense and making no progress as a state. We can't make significant progress until we get rid of this governor.
- Grace Kelly's blog
- Login or register to post comments








Stumble It!
I kinda don't like it....
....I need to get and study the details a little closer, but it seems that the guv pretty much hosed the DFL leadership. It appears that he got most of what he wanted. Agreed, we need more DFLers in the legislature, but they already have fairly big majorities in both houses. I wish the DFL did a little more to make T-Paw a liitle "uncomfortable".
And the media
Just look how favorably all the media covers Governor Pawlenty, they are better than free advertising.
The budget is going to be balanced until next year
I think the legislature did an excellent job of getting light rail and balancing the budget deficit. However, storm clouds on the horizon will still present a challenge balancing the next budget as there is no sizable reserve in the cupboard. 4 stars to the leadership for crafting a very good budget agreement!!!
"the St Paul central
"the St Paul central corridor project, which puts Minnesota in next step of regional light rail. This is the best long term solution to high gas prices."
:-O
:-O :-O :-O :-O :-O :-O :-O
.
.
:-(
Ms. Kelly...it is so not the best long-term solution to high gas prices.
Other technologies are equally good long-term solutions to the "high gas prices" bit AND they're actually solutions, not problem-causers, to the increasing wealth gap.
:-(
Equal on the "high gas prices" thing to other solutions...sure.
But "best?"
Please, consider it...it really isn't "best." There are SO many other equally environmentally friendly and equally long-term-effective and equal in cost forms of transit.
And once you factor in other problems, it's like...geez...train-style transportation on urban streets is like...biofuels or something.
Y'know? Just like grease cars w/ extra fry grease = good, Ogala-aquifer-and-Indonesian-rainforest-depleting biofuels = bad...
...train-based transit on highway-like areas = good, train-based transit on highly developed (by the poor) streets where they can, on account of bus-based transit, pull themselves out of an "income-only" lifestyle for their families, = bad.
:-(
Sorry
I meant the best of what happened in the legislative solutions offered this year. Which I agree is not the best in universe. Sigh, I hope the light transit becomes the regional solution, otherwise this is a very expensive three miles.