Pawlenty Successfully Destroys One Public School

Pawlenty has shown that he would gladly raise taxes to build a stadium, yet not raise taxes for any mainline normal good government. Pawlenty has especially starved education, so that now only the bare bones of education is left. Now we have the first school district - Greenway, where its only hope of existence is to combine with another school district. Greenway was depending on local bonding referendums to continue, the last referendum failed so:

"The district's only legitimate choice now is to find a way to cover the debt while entering into some kind of consolidation with Grand Rapids or Nashwauk-Keewatin."
(Minnesota Brown)

This is part of an overall pattern:

Anderson explained the main purpose of the paper: "It looked at the "Minnesota
Miracle," which was a legislative decision to try to place the burden for funding schools onto the state rather than local sources. In recent years, this process has resulted in tax cuts for property owners, while rural schools have had to rely on referendums in order to gain funding." Thorson elaborated: "Changes in Minnesota school funding since 2001 have devastated small, rural schools. The State basically reneged on its pledge to fully fund schools at the state level, and instead put into a place that systematically discriminates against small, rural schools."
(University of Minnesota Morris)

My St Paul school district is also depending on local bonding referendums. Basically, I wondered what happens when there is not enough money to continue. The Republicans hate public education, it violates their principle where only the rich and the privileged should have access to good education. They want to say private education is better and Republicans make that happen by starving education, This state used to always do better economically than other states because of the Minnesota miracle of education.

In fact, Republicans hate all good government. Grover Norquist: 'Field Marshal' of the Bush Plan"My goal is to cut government in half in twenty-five years," he says, "to get it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub." The Republicans are the party that hates government, the party that wants to drown government in a bathtub. The inability of the federal government to effectively deal with disaster of Hurricane Katrina proves that Republicans have destroyed the federal level of government. Now Pawlenty has basically destroyed the Greenway school system, and put all of the school districts under stress. The falling bridge and other closed bridges show the decaying nature of our transportation, that the brave legislature had to override the Governor Pawlenty with bipartisan support to improve transportation. For years, the state share of local government funding has been constantly reduced and this year there is now even a cap of 3.9% increases for local funding, The continued fiscal crises and falling government service show that Minnesota government is indeed being cut "to get it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub."

The continued fiscal irresponsibility of the government is demonstrated by the willingness to finance on borrowing rather than raise revenue. The continued tax unfairness of Pawlenty is demonstrated by his veto in a previous session of a revenue neutral bill that would have raised the state income tax on families making more than $400,000 and individuals earning more than $200,000 so that overall the richest would come closer to paying the same tax burden on each dollar earned as our poorest people. The revenue would have offset the unfair high rising property taxes, that burden of financing government has shifted to. It sure does feel like Pawlenty is trying to drown Minnesota government in a bathtub!

It's worse than you think

Did you see that there is a school petitioning MDE to go to a 9 hour, 4 day week to save on bus costs? In a day and age where some are pushing for more education time, schools are having to cut entire days!

The school I teach at in St. Paul had to cut 15 teachers, and the librarian. We have a school of 90% poverty, with fabulous teachers, but we are sysematically losing good teachers.

Justice will only exist where those not affected by injustice are filled with the same amount of indignaation as those offended.

Greenway Consolidation

Rural consolidation is inevitable. MIB? Mesabi East? What makes Coleraine special? )except for it's storied hockey history) Get over it and face financial reality.

"Get over it" - No Way!

I guess I am female, yet I was never willing to play the victim, nor to be the accepting positive bubbly empty female type.

My response is

Fight Back

To stand up and keep fighting in the Wellstone way, to fight with words, to fight with ideas, and to fight with a little old lady's voice who will not shut up.

It is not ok. We should not get over it.

We should speak out. We should organize. We should change the world.

The bigger picture

First, thanks for the quote Grace -- I meant to update my earlier post but am hopping up here with a couple big projects.

Second, HA, I am not opposed to consolidation in some cases. I advocated for managed consolidation that preserved good curriculum and extra curriculars for students back when I was a Range newspaper editor in 2002. My problem with the Greenway situation is that this has the potential to snowball. On the Range, we have the St Louis County school district which is seven small schools spread out all over the area. They survived by consolidating some time ago. But after Greenway, no district is in more trouble that the St Louis County district. Rural districts with high transportation costs and low property tax value suffer tremendously, indeed disproportionately, under the current administration's education funding philosophy. You mention MIB and Mesabi East ... those districts are HURTING. Educational options and quality have dropped across the region. It's not all Pawlenty's fault, but the failure to solve the problem rests with his veto of last year's education bill and his governing style that put is this position. It's completely contrary to the Minnesota Miracle concept that vowed equal educational opportunity for all students regardless of where they live.

Oh, and I should clarify that I suggest that Greenway's only "real" option is to consolidate, but they may not do that. They can creep along for a couple more years with no advanced courses, no extracurriculars and massive class sizes. They may also try to go for another referendum, but I have doubts that it will pass. I know good Democrats, huge backers of education, that vote "no" on these things because they reject Pawlenty's shift of education funding onto the backs of homeowners instead of the state as a whole. This is a state problem.

www.minnesotabrown.com

My point exactly

The Range (and all other school districts) really will not benefit from the budget agreement to allow some 50 bucks a student to be reallocated to operating expense It's just a shift no new money.
I was too strident using "get over it" I should rephrase "expect change to be hard but act while you have some input in the matter" Nebraska rural schools have had to consolidate for a third and fourth time because they were unwilling to lose their individual identities. It has been very costly. We are now seeing it happening again here.

More than a state problem, it's a national problem

There is research that shows when school districts consolidate, students spend longer times on the bus and have less time for extracurricular activities, sleep, studies, or family time.
A sense of community is also lost when a school is shut down. More information at The Rural School and Community Trust: www.ruraledu.org/site/c.beJMIZOCIrH/b.1073993/k.9100/Consolidation.htm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.